Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Response to The Princess and the Frog


This was my first time watching The Princess and the Frog, and my initial impression was that it did an adequate job of portraying the time period.  While it did shy away from addressing race relations during that time period, that is to be expected from a Disney film, and most children’s films.  Jim Crow laws and the unfair treatment of blacks in the United States is a real issue, and something we should not just pretend didn’t and still does not exist.  However, there are other ways of addressing this issue, and I can understand why Disney did not want to include this as a part of their story.  This being said, there were still subtle ways that this issue was addressed, such as the fact that Tiana’s mother was the housemaid of ‘Big Daddy’ La Bouff.  It was also portrayed by the fact that Tiana and her parents lived in the ghetto of New Orleans, while the prominent white characters lived in a mansion.

Another controversy that has come up with regards to this film is the portrayal of Tiana, who critics have claimed is really a “white” princess with black skin.  Personally, I do not know how the Disney animators could have made Tiana’s character any more “black” without succumbing to certain stereotypes.  It also makes me wonder what exactly critics were looking for in a black princess.  At the end of the day, she stays true to her roots and her father, making her a human like anyone else, and confining because of her race also does not solve the problem of race portrayal. 

I also felt as if this film did a good job of gender portrayal.  Tiana is a hardworking, independent woman who can take care of herself without the presence of a man.  She remains focused on her goal of opening a gourmet restaurant throughout the film, not giving up on her and her father’s dream.  Prince Naveen, on the other hand, is a completely insufficient on his own, relying on what he hopes will be the wealth of the La Bouff family to allow him to continue to live his lavish lifestyle.  This “reverse sexism,” in the context of other Disney films, sends a good message to children that men and women are not confined to specific roles, but rather that a woman can be just as independent as a man.  On the whole, I feel as if The Princess and the Frog was a progressive film in Disney’s standards, and the fact that it wasn’t as successful as other princess films likely has more to do with the fact that many children and adults may not have been ready for a black princess.

Sunday, March 29, 2015

In light of the movie we recently watched, I think I just found the most adorable rendition of Carl you'll ever come across:

Adult remakes of Disney movies?


The most recent episode of Saturday Night Live featured a mock advertisement for a live remake of Bambi, featuring Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson as Bambi, Vin Diesel as Thumper, Tyrese Gibson as Flower, Michelle Rodriguez as Faline.  While this comedy sketch was not meant to be serious, it is interesting to think about the possibilities of turning some of Disney’s feature films into serious adult films.  This is actually something that I could see being done, for example, with the princess stories, considering that many of the original stories that were told in Europe in the Middle Ages were not intended for a young audience.  Instead, they had deeper meanings and significance that could only be understood by adults.

Despite this possibility, I do not see Disney making films intended for an older audience anytime soon.  After all, their main goal is to provide entertainment that is suitable for the whole family.  However, it would be interesting to see other film production companies, or even one of Disney’s subsidiaries, take up this challenge.  Those are films that I believe a lot of adults would be interested in seeing, considering so many grew up watching the originals over and over again.

The link to the article with the video clip is below:
http://deadline.com/2015/03/the-rock-bambi-remake-saturday-night-live-1201400655/

Where is The Incredibles 2?


One of my favorite animated films of all time, The Incredibles (2004), has now been out for over a decade, and somehow a sequel has not yet been released.  This has left me dumbfounded, considering how successful the original film was.  The general consensus, even among my friends today, is that The Incredibles 2 would be, quite frankly, “incredible,” and we would all definitely go to watch it in theaters.  Hopefully the sequel, which was finally announced as under development last year, will live up to our almost impossibly high expectations.  Possible dates for its release are November 22, 2017, or June 15, 2018, dates that Pixar has already revealed are release dates for future, unnamed films.  Watching this film would be an “incredible” experience to have during my last year in college!

The link to the article where I found this information is below:
http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-incredibles-2-release-date-news-plot-rumors-two-mystery-dates-penciled-in-for-sequel-136537/

Coasting on Previous Successes


As we saw with Alice in Wonderland (2010), or as we have sees this year with the remake of Cinderella, Disney has started to turn their animated films into live-action movies, allowing them to recycle storylines and characters and still get away with it.  In fact, they are becoming very successful doing it, too.  The remake of Alice in Wonderland, directed by Tim Burton, made over $1 billion in the box office around the world.  Maleficent (2014), the remake of Sleeping Beauty, grossed $758 million, despite mixed reviews.  We will also soon see other Disney remakes, such as The Jungle Book in 2016, starring Bill Murray, Scarlett Johansson and Idris Elba, and Beauty and the Beast, starring Emma Watson and Dan Stevens.  This, in my opinion, is a brilliant financial move.  I just hope that these new films are not bland, boring remakes of Disney classics.

The link to the article where I found this information is below:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/disneys-lucrative-long-term-creative-plan-focuses-on-human-remakes-of-cartoon-classics/articleshow/46722041.cms

It’s All About the Money


While critics argue back and forth about symbols and meanings of Disney films, and classes such as this one are devoted to analyzing them, we sometimes forget to take a step back and look at the bigger picture.  In this particular case, the bigger picture is that Disney has one goal: to make money.  I have already discussed this in previous posts, but I found another interesting article titled “3 Reasons Why The Walt Disney Company Is Brilliant,” which highlights how Disney shareholders have received a 221% return on their investment in only the past five years.  Despite the controversies brought up with many of their films, Disney executives can still go home at the end of the day knowing that their company is and will continue to make billions of dollars each year.

The link to the article is below:
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/03/28/3-reasons-why-the-walt-disney-company-is-brilliant.aspx

Despite claims that there are racial and gender biases portrayed in their characters, this map proves that there is diversity in the backgrounds of characters in Disney and Pixar films.